Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Seventy-five percent (75%) of the state’s opioid settlement funds are held in the Kansas Fights Addiction (KFA) Fund,[1] which is administered by the Sunflower Foundation.[2]
Excepting administrative expenses,[3] and less $200,000 annually for the state’s prescription drug monitoring program,[4] monies in the KFA Fund must be spent on “projects and activities that prevent, reduce, treat or mitigate the effects of substance abuse and addiction.”[5]
Kansas Fights Addiction Grant Review Board decides (but must consult state departments). Monies in the KFA Fund must be spent as grants approved by the Kansas Fights Addiction Act Grant Review Board (KFA Grant Review Board).[6] The KFA Grant Review Board ultimately decides for themselves which specific awards to approve from this share but must consult the Kansas Prescription Drug and Opioid Advisory Committee, the Kansas Department of Health and Environment, the Kansas Insurance Department, and “other appropriate public and private entities” when making its decisions.[7]
These monies are granted to state agencies, local governments, non-profit organizations, and for-profit entities for abatement projects and activities, who receive the state’s settlement funds by applying for funding through the KFA Grant Review Board.[8]
The Sunflower Foundation, retained by the state Attorney General to help the KFA Grant Review Board carry out its duties,[9] administers the grant program.[10] When awarding grants, the KFA Grant Review Board must ensure that at least 1/8 of KFA Funds granted annually go to services in each of the state’s four congressional districts and consider the sustainability of grant programming after funds are exhausted.[11]
Yes, supplantation is prohibited. State law requires the Kansas Fights Addiction (KFA) Fund to be spent as grants and explicitly states that grant expenditures “shall not be used to supplant any other source of funding.”12 This means that the 50% KFA Fund share may only be spent in ways that supplement — rather than replace (or “supplant’) — existing resources.
Yes (public reporting not required, only intrastate). You can find detailed information on KFA Grant Review Board’s Board Materials page (e.g., “Public Info on All Awarded KFA Grants”). The KFA Grant Review Board is also required to submit an annual report on its activities to state legislative leaders, the governor, and state attorney general,[12] but there is no requirement that the KFA Grant Review Board affirmatively make this report publicly available.[13]
Visit OpioidSettlementTracker.com’s Expenditure Report Tracker for an updated collection of states’ and localities’ available expenditure reports.
In early 2024, the Kansas state legislature passed a budget bill that sought to allocate the state’s share of settlement funds outside the established process for the distribution of such funds by the KFA Grant Review Board.[14] An April 2024 letter from the Kansas Fights Addiction Board noted that “the legislative actions risk the state’s ability to maximize settlement funding recover for Kansas” and that “investing settlement dollars outside of a coordinated and evaluated strategy … weakens the state’s ability to leverage settlement dollars, fuel innovation and modernize the state’s substance use disorder system.”[15] Kansas Governor Laura Kelly successfully vetoed the legislature’s proposed direct allocations of state settlement funds using language that mirrored the KFA Grant Review Board’s April 2024 letter.[16]
Kan. Stat. Ann. Sec. 75-777(a) (“the attorney general shall remit to the state treasurer … all moneys that are received by the state pursuant to opioid litigation,” “[T]he state treasurer shall deposit the entire amount into the state treasury,” then “credit 75% of each such deposit to the Kansas fights addiction fund”). See also Kansas Opioids Memorandum of Understanding Between the Attorney General, the League of Kansas Municipalities, and the Kansas Association of Counties, Sec. C.1 (describing statewide allocation). ↑
Kan. Stat. Ann. Secs. 75-777(b) (“There is hereby established in the state treasury the Kansas fights addiction fund, and such fund shall be administered by the attorney general”), 75-778(d)(1) (“The attorney general shall provide administrative support for the board and shall administer, monitor and assure compliance with conditions on grants awarded”), 75-778(d)(2) (“To carry out the duties and responsibilities under paragraph (1), the attorney general may enter into an agreement with the sunflower foundation to provide such administration, monitoring and assurance of compliance”). ↑
Kansas Opioids Memorandum of Understanding Between the Attorney General, the League of Kansas Municipalities, and the Kansas Association of Counties, Sec. E.4 (“Expenses for the administration of the distribution of settlement funds, pursuant to the Settlement Funds Distribution Procedure, shall be shared proportionally among the Parties”). See also Kan. Stat. Ann. Sec. 75-777(b) (“No moneys shall be expended from the Kansas fights addiction fund for the payment of litigation costs, expenses or attorney fees related to opioid litigation”). ↑
Kan. Stat. Ann. Sec. 75-777(c). ↑
Kan. Stat. Ann. Sec. 75-777(b) (“moneys in the Kansas fights addiction fund shall be expended … for grants approved by the Kansas fights addiction grant review board created by [Sec.] 75-778, and amendments thereto, to qualified applicants for projects and activities that prevent, reduce, treat or mitigate the effects of substance abuse and addiction”). See also Kansas Opioids Memorandum of Understanding Between the Attorney General, the League of Kansas Municipalities, and the Kansas Association of Counties, Secs. D.1 (“Regardless of allocation, all Settlement Funds shall be used in a manner consistent with the Approved Purposes”), A.1 (defining “Approved Purpose(s)” to mean “projects and activities, including, but not limited to law enforcement, that prevent, reduce, treat, or mitigate the effects of substance abuse and addiction or to reimburse the State or Political Subdivisions for previous expenses related to substance abuse mitigation or arising from covered conduct”). Kansas’ official opioid settlement documents do not refer to the national settlement agreements’ (non-exhaustive) Exhibit E, which includes prevention, harm reduction, treatment, recovery, and other strategies. See Distributor Settlement Agreement I.SS (“Exhibit E provides a non-exhaustive list of expenditures that qualify as being paid for Opioid Remediation. Qualifying expenditures may include reasonable related administrative expenses”). ↑
Kan. Stat. Ann. Secs. 75-777(b) (“moneys in the Kansas fights addiction fund shall be expended … for grants approved by the Kansas fights addiction grant review board created by K.S.A. 2023 Supp. 75-778, and amendments thereto”), 75-778(a) (“There is hereby created under the jurisdiction of the attorney general the Kansas fights addiction grant review board”). The Board is empowered to create its own operating procedures. Kan. Stat. Ann. Sec. 75-778(b). ↑
Kan. Stat. Ann. Sec. 75-778(c)(3) (“shall consult with the Kansas prescription drug and opioid advisory committee, the department of health and environment, the insurance department and other appropriate public and private entities to ensure coordination of drug abuse and addiction prevention and mitigation efforts throughout the state”). “Other appropriate public and private entities” includes, for example, the Kansas Department of Aging and Disability Service. See Annual Report for January 1, 2022 – December 31, 2022. Kansas Fights Addiction Grant Review Board. March 1, 2023. Accessed August 12, 2024. ↑
Kan. Stat. Ann. Secs. 75-778(b) (requiring board to “receive and consider applications”), 75-777(b) (“for grants … to qualified applicants for projects and activities that prevent, reduce, treat or mitigate the effects of substance abuse and addiction”), 75-776 (defining “qualified applicant” to mean “any state entity, municipality, not-for-profit private entity or for-profit private entity that provides services for the purpose of preventing, reducing, treating or otherwise abating or remediating substance abuse or addiction and that has released its legal claims arising from covered conduct against each defendant that is required by opioid litigation to pay into the fund”). See also Kansas Fights Addiction Act Grant Review Board. Kansas Attorney General website. Accessed August 12, 2024 (“To be eligible, [local government] applicants also must release all legal claims arising from covered conduct against each defendant named in the opioid settlement agreements”). But see KFA Grant Program Frequently Asked Questions. Sunflower Foundation website. Accessed August 12, 2024 (“Are for-profit entities eligible to apply for this RFP? No, not at this time. We recognize that legislation was recently passed adding for-profit entities to the definition of eligible entities under the Kansas Fights Addiction Act. However, the board is in the process of establishing appropriate procedures and processes to fund for-profit entities as these processes are not the same as those for non-profits and units of government”). ↑
Kan. Stat. Ann. Secs. 75-777(b), 75-778(d)(1), 775-778(d)(2). ↑
Kan. Stat. Ann. Sec. 75-778(d)(2)(A) (“The sunflower administration shall administer any such moneys in a manner consistent with this act and with grants approved by the board”). ↑
Kan. Stat. Ann. Secs. 75-778(c)(1), (5). The Board may also give preference to grants that expand the availability of certified drug treatment programs for court-ordered treatment for individuals charged with certain controlled substance offenses. Kas. Stat. Ann. Sec. 75-778(c)(8). ↑
Kan. Stat. Ann. Sec. 75-781 (“Not later than March 1 of each year, the Kansas fights addiction grant review board shall submit to the speaker of the house of representatives, the president of the senate, the governor and the attorney general a report of the board’s activities during the prior calendar year, including: (a) An accounting of moneys deposited into and expended from the Kansas fights addiction fund; (b) a summary of each approved grant, including the name and a detailed description of the qualified applicant, the amount granted, the justification for the grant with a detailed description of the grant’s intended use and any other relevant information the board deems appropriate; (c) an explanation of how the board’s actions during the year have complied with the requirements of this act; and (d) any other relevant information the board deems appropriate”). ↑
These reports are, however, public records that may be requested. Statement based on an August 2024 email exchange among the Kansas Attorney General’s Office, Vital Strategies, and OpioidSettlementTracker.com. ↑
See, e.g., 2023-2024 Kansas Senate Bill 28, Secs. 32(b), 83(b). ↑
April 19, 2024 letter from the Kansas Fights Addiction Grant Review Board to unnamed recipient. Accessed August 12, 2024. The letter also explained that the legislature’s attempt to circumvent the KFA Grant Review Board’s process “sets a precedent that will be nearly impossible to manage” and “create an unfair advantage for organizations seeking settlement dollars, requiring organizations to choose between following the processes set up through the KFA board or requesting funds directly from their legislator.” Id. ↑
Message from the Governor Regarding Veto of Senate Bill 28. Governor Laura Kelly. April 24, 2024 (“The Legislature created the Kansas Fights Addiction Board to review and approve applications for funding through the State’s opioid settlement, the Kansas Fights Addiction Fund. While these initiatives maybe good proposals worthy of funding, direct allocation of these funds circumvents the established process and gives an unfair advantage to the organizations receiving these funds. It also makes it difficult for the Board to administer its established strategy and strategic plan for the settlement. If the Legislature wants to change the process through which these funds are allocated, it should pass standalone legislation to do so”). ↑
Here are the entities that ultimately decide how each of Kansas’s opioid settlement shares are spent:
75% Kansas Fights Addiction Fund share: Kansas Fights Addiction Act Grant Review Board
25% Municipalities Fight Addiction Fund share: decisionmakers for cities and counties
Twenty-five percent (25%) of Kansas’ opioid settlement funds are held in the Municipalities Fight Addiction Fund (“MFA Fund”),[1] which is administered by the state Attorney General and distributed per capita to local governments.[2] This share is split evenly between Kansas’ cities and counties.[3]
12.5% of Kansas’ opioid settlement funds is directly allocated to Kansas’ cities, with litigating cities that have released their claims receiving a 25% increase in their share.[4] Non-litigating cities are eligible to receive funds only if they passed a resolution prior to February 18, 2022 stating that they can spend their funds for approved purposes.[5]
12.5% of Kansas’ opioid settlement funds is directly allocated to Kansas’ counties, with one half (6.25%) allocated among all counties,[6] and the other half (6.25%) allocated among litigating counties that have released their claims.[7] Non-litigating counties are eligible to receive funds only if they passed a resolution prior to February 18, 2022 stating that they can spend their funds for approved purposes.[8]
Cities and counties may pool their funds or allocate them to the KFA Fund,[9] and each are required to set up separate funds to hold their opioid settlement proceeds separate from other local monies.[10]
Excepting attorneys’ fees and administrative expenses,[11] localities must use monies from the MFA Fund “in a manner consistent with the approved purposes,” which the state defines as “projects and activities that prevent, reduce, treat or mitigate the effects of substance abuse and addiction.”[12] Localities may use these funds for reimbursement purposes.[13]
Localities decide autonomously. Decisionmakers for the counties and municipalities will ultimately decide for themselves how to spend their monies on approved purposes,[14] including as sub-grants to local organizations and service providers,[15] subject to their normal budgeting processes.[16]
No, supplantation is not prohibited. Kansas does not explicitly prohibit supplantation uses of opioid settlement funds from its Municipalities Fight Addiction Fund (MFA) share. This means that local governments may use their MFA Fund shares in ways that replace (or “supplant”) — rather than supplement — existing resources.
Up to each locality (no public reporting required, only intrastate). Localities are required to report expenditures to the state.[17] Though the state does not currently publish these reports online, the Kansas Office of Attorney General has confirmed that the reports are subject to public records requests and that the state is working to increase the accessibility of its settlement expenditure data.[18]
Visit OpioidSettlementTracker.com’s for an updated collection of states’ and localities’ available expenditure reports.
Not applicable.
Based on an August 2024 email exchange between the Kansas Attorney General’s Office, Vital Strategies, and OpioidSettlementTracker.com. ↑
75% Kansas Fights Addiction Fund (KFA) share: Depends on future programming (not required). The is not required to seek public input on uses of its share. However, in late 2023, the Sunflower Foundation selected the University of Kansas Center for Public Partnerships and Research to complete a “year-long, comprehensive statewide needs assessment of substance use disorder (SUD) systems and related work” to support planning and future investments by the Kansas Fights Addiction Review Board.[1] This effort, , conducted an online survey that invited the public to engage in visioning about the future and to offer feedback on factors that will lead to transformation of the “SUD ecosystem” in Kansas.
25% Municipalities Fight Addiction Fund share: Up to each locality (not required). Local governments are not required to seek public input on uses of their shares. However, each may choose to seek such input. Watch for opportunities to weigh in on city and county spending decisions, such as city council meetings and town halls.
Yes. Kansas has established settlement-funded grant opportunities for which community organizations are eligible to apply. Visit the Sunflower Foundation’s website for information on current and past funding opportunities. Local governments also may create grant programs to distribute their share of funds. The existence, parameters, and processes for local settlement grant programs will vary by locality, so stay alert for new opportunities. Visit the (OpioidSettlementTracker.com and Legal Action Center) for the most up-to-date information on settlement grant opportunities for community organizations.
For updates on the Kansas Fights Addiction Fund share, visit the Sunflower Foundation’s page, bookmark the KFA Grant Review Board’s , and from , which has described “in-person community visits, periodic webinars, and a newsletter” as some of its future programming to “gather information, as well as provide periodic content updates and notes on the project processes.”[2] Kansans can request to join the KFA Grant Review Board’s mailing list by emailing to receive updates on KFA Grant Review Board meetings and announcements.
To find updates on the Municipalities Fight Addiction Fund share, a good starting point is to check the websites for your county commission, city council, or local health department. See also the League of Kansas Municipalities’ page.
Not applicable.
. Sunflower Foundation and University of Kansas Center for Public Partnerships and Research press release. December 19, 2023. Accessed September 1,2024. ↑
See . United to Transform website. Accessed September 1, 2024. ↑
This Community Guide will describe how Kansas is spending its opioid settlements and whether Kansas is working to ensure community access to opioid settlement funds. Last revised September 1, 2024.
Kan. Stat. Ann. Secs. 75-777(a) (“the attorney general shall remit to the state treasurer … all moneys that are received by the state pursuant to opioid litigation,” “the state treasurer shall deposit the entire amount into the state treasury,” then “credit … 25% of each such deposit to the municipalities fight addiction fund”), 75-777(d)(1) (“There is hereby established in the state treasury the municipalities fight addiction fund”). See also Kansas Opioids Memorandum of Understanding Between the Attorney General, the League of Kansas Municipalities, and the Kansas Association of Counties, Sec. (describing statewide allocation). ↑
Kan. Stat. Ann. Secs. 75-777(d)(1) (“such fund shall be administered by the attorney general to disburse funds to municipalities”), 75-777(d)(2) (describing disbursements from the MFA Fund to both municipalities “that have not filed opioid litigation” and those that have and released their claims); Kansas Opioids Memorandum of Understanding Between the Attorney General, the League of Kansas Municipalities, and the Kansas Association of Counties, Sec. (“The city and county shares … of the Municipalities Fight Addiction Fund shall be allocated per capita”). ↑
Kansas Opioids Memorandum of Understanding Between the Attorney General, the League of Kansas Municipalities, and the Kansas Association of Counties, Secs. , (“Maximizing Settlement Funds shall be distributed directly to the eligible Political Subdivisions, both cities and counties, by the Attorney General or in some other manner consistent with the provisions 2021 Kansas House Bill 2079”). ↑
Kansas Opioids Memorandum of Understanding Between the Attorney General, the League of Kansas Municipalities, and the Kansas Association of Counties, Secs. (“The allocation of Maximizing Settlement Funds to the cities shall be distributed … to Litigating Cities that have entered a Release and Assignment Agreement according to each such Litigating City’s population proportional to the total population of all cities in Kansas, multiplied by 1.25”), (defining “Litigating City” or “Litigating County” to mean “a Political Subdivision that filed or became a party to opioid litigation in court prior to January 1, 2021, or received approval from the Attorney General to file or become a party to opioid litigation and has filed or become a party to opioid litigation on or after January 1, 2021”), (defining “Political Subdivision” to mean “any Kansas city or county”). ↑
Kansas Opioids Memorandum of Understanding Between the Attorney General, the League of Kansas Municipalities, and the Kansas Association of Counties, Secs. (“the balance, thereof, distributed to all eligible non-litigating cities”), (requiring resolution to state that the city “has previous or expected expenses related to substance abuse or addiction mitigation or other covered conduct in excess of $500” and can use the funds “in accordance with the approved purposes”), (modifying date by which localities must have passed a resolution). ↑
Kansas Opioids Memorandum of Understanding Between the Attorney General, the League of Kansas Municipalities, and the Kansas Association of Counties, Sec. . ↑
Kansas Opioids Memorandum of Understanding Between the Attorney General, the League of Kansas Municipalities, and the Kansas Association of Counties, Secs. (“50% of the total allocation of Maximizing Settlement Funds to the counties shall be distributed to the Litigating Counties that have entered a Release and Assignment Agreement”), (defining “Litigating City” or “Litigating County” to mean “a Political Subdivision that filed or became a party to opioid litigation in court prior to January 1, 2021, or received approval from the Attorney General to file or become a party to opioid litigation and has filed or become a party to opioid litigation on or after January 1, 2021”), (defining “Political Subdivision” to mean “any Kansas city or county”). See also Kansas Opioids Memorandum of Understanding Between the Attorney General, the League of Kansas Municipalities, and the Kansas Association of Counties, Sec. (“This 50% assumes that 100% of Litigating Counties are participating. If less than 100% of Litigating Counties participate, this 50% to the Litigating Counties is reduced by the corresponding reduction in the settlement”). ↑
Kansas Opioids Memorandum of Understanding Between the Attorney General, the League of Kansas Municipalities, and the Kansas Association of Counties, Secs. (requiring resolution to state that the county “has previous or expected expenses related to substance abuse or addiction mitigation or other covered conduct in excess of $500” and can use the funds “in accordance with the approved purposes”), (modifying date by which localities must have passed a resolution). ↑
Kansas Opioids Memorandum of Understanding Between the Attorney General, the League of Kansas Municipalities, and the Kansas Association of Counties, Sec. . ↑
Kansas Opioids Memorandum of Understanding Between the Attorney General, the League of Kansas Municipalities, and the Kansas Association of Counties, Sec. (“Maximizing Settlement Funds distributed to the eligible Political Subdivisions shall be held in a segregated account by the respective Political Subdivisions to be used for Approved Purposes. Funds in this special revenue fund shall not be commingled with any other money or fund of the Political Subdivision”). ↑
Kan. Stat. Ann. Sec. 75-777(d)(1) (“[MFA Fund] [m]oneys may … be used to reimburse municipalities for the payment of litigation costs, expenses or attorney fees related to opioid litigation, except that a municipality shall first seek payment from applicable outside settlement sources or settlement fee funds prior to seeking payment from the municipalities fight addiction fund”); Kansas Opioids Memorandum of Understanding Between the Attorney General, the League of Kansas Municipalities, and the Kansas Association of Counties, Sec. (“Expenses for the administration of the distribution of settlement funds, pursuant to the Settlement Funds Distribution Procedure, shall be shared proportionally among the Parties”). See also Kansas Opioids Memorandum of Understanding Between the Attorney General, the League of Kansas Municipalities, and the Kansas Association of Counties, Sec. (repeating much of the same). Importantly, the MOU does add that the state Attorney General may use the MFA Fund for attorneys’ fees as well. See Kansas Opioids Memorandum of Understanding Between the Attorney General, the League of Kansas Municipalities, and the Kansas Association of Counties, Secs. (“Moneys in the Municipalities Fight Addiction fund may also be used by State and Political Subdivisions for the payment of litigation costs, expenses or attorney fees related to opioid litigation”), (defining the “State” to mean “the State of Kansas acting through its Attorney General”). ↑
Kan. Stat. Ann. Sec. 75-777(d)(1) (“Moneys in the municipalities fight addiction fund shall be expended subject to [the MOU] for projects and activities that prevent, reduce, treat or mitigate the effects of substance abuse and addiction or to reimburse the municipality for previous expenses related to substance abuse mitigation or arising from covered conduct”); Kansas Opioids Memorandum of Understanding Between the Attorney General, the League of Kansas Municipalities, and the Kansas Association of Counties, Secs. (“Regardless of allocation, all Settlement Funds shall be used in a manner consistent with the Approved Purposes”), (defining “Approved Purpose(s)” to mean “projects and activities, including, but not limited to law enforcement, that prevent, reduce, treat, or mitigate the effects of substance abuse and addiction or to reimburse the State or Political Subdivisions for previous expenses related to substance abuse mitigation or arising from covered conduct”). ↑
Kansas Opioids Memorandum of Understanding Between the Attorney General, the League of Kansas Municipalities, and the Kansas Association of Counties, Sec. (“Prior to using any Settlement Funds as reimbursement for previous expenses related to substance abuse mitigation or arising from covered conduct, a Political Subdivision shall pass a resolution stating that its previous expenses related to substance abuse mitigation or arising from covered conduct are greater than or equal to the amount of funds that the Political subdivision seeks to use for reimbursement”). ↑
Kan. Stat. Ann. Sec. 75-777(d)(2) (“An agreement between the attorney general, the Kansas association of counties and the league of Kansas municipalities shall determine the method for disbursing moneys from the fund”); Kansas Opioids Memorandum of Understanding Between the Attorney General, the League of Kansas Municipalities, and the Kansas Association of Counties, Secs. (describing direct payment of localities’ amounts to their respective segregated accounts), (same for Maximizing Settlement Funds), (describing cities’ and counties’ myriad powers to spend their monies on approved purposes and attorneys’ fees). See also Kan. Stat. Ann. Sec. 75-777a(a) (“The board of county commissioners of any county may provide, by adoption of a resolution, for a municipalities fight addiction fund to finance expenditures incurred as described in K.S.A. 2023 Supp. ”). ↑
Kansas Opioids Memorandum of Understanding Between the Attorney General, the League of Kansas Municipalities, and the Kansas Association of Counties, Sec. (“Although Political Subdivisions may make contracts with or grants to a nonprofit, charity, or other entity, they may not assign to another entity their rights to receive Maximizing Settlement Funds”). ↑
Kan. Stat. Ann. Sec. 75-777a(b) (“Expenditures from the fund shall be subject to the budget requirements of K.S.A. through ”). ↑
Kansas Opioids Memorandum of Understanding Between the Attorney General, the League of Kansas Municipalities, and the Kansas Association of Counties, Sec. . ↑
Yes. State law established the Kansas Fights Addition (KFA) Grant Review Board (Board) to receive and consider applications for grants from the 50% “Kansas Fights Addiction Fund” share.[1] The KFA Grant Review Board is empowered to establish its own rules of operation, hold hearings, receive testimony, and seek additional information to carry out its work.[2]
Grant approvals require at least six votes from the 11-member Board.[3] When awarding grants, the Board must:[4]
Ensure that no less than 1/8 of total funds granted each year are for services in each of Kansas’ congressional districts and are “supporting service[s] throughout the state”[5]
Take “science and data-driven substance abuse prevention reduction, treatment[,] or mitigation strategies” into account[6]
Consult with the Kansas Prescription Drug and Opioid Advisory Committee,[7] Kansas Department of Health and Environment, Kansas Insurance Department, and “other appropriate public and private entities” to promote coordination of efforts across the state[8]
Consider the sustainability of programming once grant funds are depleted[9]
The KFA Grant Review Board is empowered to establish additional grant award conditions and may give preference to applicants that are not otherwise receiving opioid litigation funds or that expand drug treatment programs for certain individuals with criminal-legal system involvement.[10]
Meetings of the KFA Grant Review Board take place on the second Friday of each month.[11] Meeting minutes, planning documents, and information on awarded grants can be found on the KFA Grant Review Board’s website.[12] The Board’s current members are listed here.
No. The KFA Grant Review Board is not required to include a member with lived and/or living experience.
State law requires that the KFA Grant Review Board be composed of 11 members who “have expertise in prevention, reduction, treatment or mitigation of the effects of substance abuse and addiction.”[13] All members serve at the pleasure of their appointing authorities:[14]
Member appointed by the state Attorney General, who serves as chair[15]
Member appointed by the Governor[16]
Four (4) members appointed by majority and minority leadership in each legislative chamber[17]
Member appointed by the League of Kansas Municipalities[18]
Member appointed by the Kansas Association of Counties[19]
Member appointed by the Kansas County and District Attorneys Association[20]
Member appointed by the Association of Community Mental Health Centers of Kansas[21]
A member appointed by the Kansas Behavioral Sciences Regulatory Board[22]
No (up to each locality). Local governments in Kansas are not required to establish opioid settlement advisory bodies. However, localities may choose to establish advisory councils that include member(s) with lived and/or living experience to help ensure that settlement spending reflects community priorities.
Not applicable.
Kan. Stat. Ann. Sec.75-778(b). ↑
Kan. Stat. Ann. Sec.75-778(b). ↑
Kan. Stat. Ann. Sec.75-778(b). ↑
Kan. Stat. Ann. Sec.75-778(c). ↑
Kan. Stat. Ann. Sec. 75-778(c)(1). ↑
Kan. Stat. Ann. Sec. 75-778(c)(2). ↑
This Committee, unlike the KFA Grant Review Board, is not explicitly tasked with opioid settlement-specific duties. See Kansas Prescription Drug & Opioid Advisory Committee. Kansas Department of Health and Environment Division of Public Health website. Accessed September 1, 2024 (“The Kansas Prescription Drug and Opioid Advisory Committee aims to increase education and awareness and prevent substance use and misuse disorders while connecting individuals who use drugs with treatment and wraparound services. The multidisciplinary stakeholder group is composed of state and local government, health systems, professional associations, community-based programs, academic institutions, public safety and first responders”). ↑
Kan. Stat. Ann. Sec. 75-778(c)(3). ↑
Kan. Stat. Ann. Sec. 75-778(c)(5). ↑
Kan. Stat. Ann. Secs. 75-778(c)(6)-(8). ↑
See, e.g., Kansas Fights Addiction Act Grant Review Board (“Upcoming Meetings”). Kansas Attorney General website. Accessed September 1, 2024. ↑
As of September 1, 2024, the most recent posted minutes are from June 2023. ↑
Kan. Stat. Ann. Sec. 75-778(a). ↑
Kan. Stat. Ann. Sec. 75-778(a). ↑
Kan. Stat. Ann. Sec. 75-778(a)(1). ↑
Kan. Stat. Ann. Sec. 75-778(a)(2). ↑
Kan. Stat. Ann. Secs. 75-778(a)(3)-(6). Specifically, a member appointed by the President of the Senate, a member appointed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives, a member appointed by the minority leader of the Senate, and a member appointed by the minority leader of the House of Representatives. ↑
Kan. Stat. Ann. Sec. 75-778(a)(7). ↑
Kan. Stat. Ann. Sec. 75-778(a)(8). ↑
Kan. Stat. Ann. Sec. 75-778(a)(9). ↑
Kan. Stat. Ann. Sec. 75-778(a)(10). ↑
Kan. Stat. Ann. Sec. 75-778(a)(11). ↑
Ultimate Decisionmaker
Local officials for cities and counties
Decision-making Process
The Kansas Fights Addiction Act Grant Review Board approves spending of this share after consulting the Kansas Prescription Drug and Opioid Advisory Committee, the Kansas Department of Health and Environment, the Kansas Insurance Department, and other stakeholders.
Localities decide autonomously
Supplantation
Prohibited
Not prohibited
Grant Funding
Yes. See the Kansas Fights Addiction (KFA) Grant Program page.
Up to each locality (availability and processes will vary)
Public Input
Depends on future programming (recurring opportunities not required)
Up to each locality (not required)
Advisory Body
Yes (required). See the KFA Grant Review Board.
The Board is not required to include member(s) with lived and/or living experience.
Up to each locality (not required)
Expenditures
No public reporting required (only intrastate), but see KFA Grant Review Board’s annual reports (e.g., 2023 Annual Report) and the “Public Info on All Awarded KFA Grants” document here.
See also Sunflower Foundation's KFA Grant Program reports (e.g., 2023 Grant Awards: Estimated Impact Reports).
No public reporting required (only intrastate)
Updates
For updates on the Kansas Fights Addiction Fund share, visit the Sunflower Foundation’s Kansas Fights Addiction page, bookmark the KFA Grant Review Board’s website, request to join the KFA Grant Review Board’s mailing list by emailing general@ag.ks.gov, and subscribe to updates from United to Transform.
To find updates on the Municipalities Fight Addiction Fund share, a good starting point is to check the websites for your county commission, city council, or local health department. See also the League of Kansas Municipalities’ Kansas Fights Addiction Act page.